IR

Double Materiality Assessment

#Double Materiality Assessment

Since the publication of our first ESG Report in 2021, SOOP has conducted a materiality analysis every year to define the key sustainability issues related to us. In the fourth ESG Report of this year, we adopted a double materiality assessment approach to identify both the impact of SOOP on our stakeholders and the impact of sustainability issues on SOOP’s corporate value. In doing so, we aim to strengthen our stakeholders’ awareness of the various sustainability issues surrounding SOOP, lay the foundation for our growth as a responsible media platform, and identify new challenges and opportunities in the rapidly changing content industry.

Double Materiality

Double materiality is a concept set out in the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive(CSRD), which means that companies should consider the following two perspectives when reporting on sustainability.

  • 1.

    the materiality of the impacts of the company’s business activities on people and environment
    (impact materiality)

  • 2.

    the materiality of the impact of sustainability issues on the company’s financial risks and opportunities
    (financial materiality)

According to the double materiality concept, sustainability issues can be material in terms of their impact on stakeholders, risks to the company, and opportunities for the company. Therefore, companies disclosing sustainability information need to analyze how their operations affect the economy, environment, and people(outward impact) from the perspective of stakeholders, and how external social and environmental factors pose risks and opportunities to them(inward impact) from the perspective of investors.

Materiality Assessment Process

To conduct an effective and accurate double materiality analysis, SOOP has designed its own methodology, which takes into account the characteristics and nature of our business and meets the requirements of the European Sustainability Reporting Standards(ESRS), the EU’s detailed indicators for ESG disclosure.

STEP 01Analyze the Internal and
External Environment and Identify Issues
  • Analyze the EU Sustainability Disclosure Guidelines
  • Benchmark issues against five companies in the same industry at home and abroad
  • Identify key regulatory and policy trends
  • Analyze the last three years of controversy issues
STEP 02Identify Impacts, Risks and Opportunities and
Derive a Final Issue Pool
  • Stakeholder analysis based on revenue structure
  • Identify impacts, risks, and opportunities related to stakeholders per issue
  • Identify the short, medium, and long-terms for each impact, risk, and opportunity
STEP 03Impact/Financial Materiality Analysis
  • Impact Materiality

    Conduct stakeholder surveys

    Reflect desk research from external experts

  • Financial Materiality

    Survey of business unit employees

    Reflect feedback from management and employees in related departments

STEP 04Select Material Issues
  • Impact Materiality x Financial Materiality
  • Prioritize issues
  • Identify material issues, reporting issues and potential issues for sustainability disclosures
Step1. Analyze the Internal and External Environment and Identify Issues

Based on the 71 thematic subtopics of the EU Sustainability Reporting Standard(ESRS), we used various sources to create an issue pool optimized for SOOP’s business environment. First, we selected five companies in the same industry at home and abroad, analyzed material issues of each of such five companies, grouped them into high-priority issues, and initially identified 28 issues. Then, we identified major regulatory trends related to business operations and stakeholders, and analyzed three years of controversy issues to identify 24 issues.

Step2. Identify Impacts, Risks, and Opportunities and Derive a Final Issue Pool

To identify all material issues across the value chain as well as SOOP’s own operations, we analyzed the value chain and revenue structure.

Reflecting the nature of SOOP as a platform company, we identified the stakeholders involved in the revenue structure as streamers, advertisers and agencies, and users. Afterwards, we identified the impact, risk, opportunity, and period of the 24 issues selected in Step 1 on these stakeholders, scored them, and finally selected a pool of 17 issues.

Step 3. Impact/Financial Materiality Analysis

Based on the 17 sustainability topics selected in Step 2, we conducted our own research to identify impact materiality and financial materiality, and conducted a survey to complement it.
In addition, in determining financial materiality, we considered the impact of various non-financial capital on financial performance by reflecting feedback from employees, including executives and heads of relevant departments/teams, and evaluated the materiality of each issue.

Sustainability Value Chain
Impact Materiality Survey
  • Survey Target

    Internal and external stakeholders, including streamers, users, employees, etc.

  • Survey Period

    March 4(Monday) to March 11(Monday)

  • The Number of Responses Submitted

    195 responses

  • Survey Topics

    Survey topics: For each issue, the seriousness and likelihood of SOOP’s actual/potential impact on the surveyed person

Financial Materiality Survey
  • Survey Target

    SOOP business unit employees

  • Survey Period

    February 27(Tuesday) to March 5(Tuesday)

  • The Number of Responses Submitted

    79 responses

  • Survey Topics

    Regarding the actual/potential impact of each issue on SOOP’s financial performance, the period over which the impact is reflected in the financial performance and the frequency of occurrence thereof

Step4. Select Material Issues

We assessed the seriousness and likelihood of occurrence of the issues to prioritize each issue by impact materiality and financial materiality.

Results of the Impact Materiality Analysis

To assess the seriousness of an issue, we measured the duration and intensity of the impact each issue has or could have on our stakeholders. In addition, to assess the likelihood of an issue, we measured the expected frequency of the impacting event. The impact materiality analysis and prioritization reflected the results of external expert’s research and stakeholder surveys.

Results of the Impact Materiality Analysis
Issue Identified Impact1) Seriousness Likelihood of Occurrence
Talent Attraction and Development Positive

Professional and regular training and education programs, talent attraction efforts through various means, and organizational adaptation contribute to improved employee satisfaction.

Negative

Limited support compared to other companies in the industry, unclear career paths increase the turnover and decrease organizational commitment.

User Protection Positive

SOOP protects users from potential risks such as personal information leakage and harmful content.

Negative

The high autonomy of the content may result in insufficient protection for users particularly children and adolescents.

Data Security and Privacy Positive

Stakeholders’ information is protected by compliance with internal data management regulations, regular security education and training, and efforts to secure personal information.

Negative

Low awareness among employees regarding personal information leaks in content/platform and a lack of appropriate solutions, can cause damage.

Work-Life Balance Positive

Flexible work environment by implementing flexible working system, management of employees’ fatigue and stress, and horizontal organizational culture creates a positive work environment.

Negative

Physical and mental damage caused by excessive work or tense broadcast schedules can negatively impact work productivity.

Human Rights Impact Management Positive

Establishing a system to protect personal information and other personally identifiable data, as well as implementing measures to safeguard human rights on content and platforms, positively impacts the protection of stakeholders’ fundamental rights.

Negative

Possible leakage of users’ personal information, cyberbullying, defamation, and human rights violations in the content.

User Satisfaction Management Positive

SOOP and users have created a positive community culture through smooth communication and feedback.

Negative

User satisfaction may decrease due to poor management of customer service satisfaction/neglect of reputation management/lack of dedicated manpower.

Health and Safety Positive

Strict compliance with safety and health regulations in content production and regular safety-related audits and training contribute to the creation of a safe culture in the content industry.

Negative

Accidents may occur due to unexpected emergencies during filming and lack of communication and prevention management can increase work environment risks.

Business Ethics Positive

Proactive responding to various risks related to ethics and raising employee’s awareness can create an ethical organizational culture.

Negative

Negative incidents related to ethics, such as embezzlement and accounting irregularities, may hinder organizational culture.

Fair Trade Positive

SOOP, its partners/contractors, streamers, and advertisers promote fair trade practices in the industry through efforts for fair contracts and transparent transactions.

Negative

Damage to stakeholders may occur due to failure to display content related to paid advertisements, information asymmetry with users, unfair trade issues, etc.

Community Impact Positive

Creating positive impacts through content that respects the culture of local communities and coexists with the local economy.

Negative

Possible dispute with civil society organizations/local residents, or sanctions from government agencies, due to lack of quick response/treatment to negative impacts resulting from SOOP’s business activities.

Advancing R&D Capabilities Positive

Securing specialized personnel, expanding self-development opportunities, and strengthening team collaboration can positively impact on enhancing employee capabilities.

Negative

Uncertainty of R&D-related outcomes and time/cost inefficiencies can increase workload for employees.

Enhance Global Competitiveness Positive

Global business have created opportunities to develop employees’ competencies such as industry expertise and language skills.

Negative

Increased workload/performance burden due to factors such as lack of understanding of cultural sensitivities, lack of communication due to physical distance, and difficulty in quickly identifying issues.

DEI(Diversity,
Equity and Inclusion)
Positive

Conveying messages of equality and respect for human rights through content that considers viewers’ diverse backgrounds, including minority groups, has positive impacts.

Negative

Content may trigger high sensitivities/social conflicts about identities such as race, gender, etc., or may be part of human rights violations.

Waste Management Positive

Positive environmental impact by efforts to reduce waste discharge in content production and compliance with waste disposal regulations in filming locations(local).

Negative

Negative environmental impacts due to excessive use of disposable products in content or improper disposal of waste, increase in electronic waste (E-Waste) resulting from poor management of digital devices and props, etc.

Environmentally Friendly Production Positive

SOOP and video producers have a positive impact on the environment by utilizing renewable energy and using eco-friendly supplies for products and services required on location.

Negative

Concerns about inefficient/excessive use of resources in the workplace, including content production, due to practical constraints such as time/cost and lack of awareness among employees/staffs.

Climate Change Positive

SOOP can spread environmental and climate change-related messages through content, education, and advertising campaigns. Additionally, its partners can support eco-friendly policies in the supply chain by offering sustainable products and services.

Negative

Continued increase in carbon emissions due to large-scale events, excessive discharge of digital waste, surging energy consumption, or maintaining energy inefficient production/working environments.

Energy Efficiency Positive

SOOP and its suppliers can use high-efficiency equipment and reflect energy efficiency-related indicators in contracts, and contribute to raising awareness through energy-efficient use by them, implementation of related training and campaign, etc.

Negative

Negative impacts on climate change/environment due to inefficiencies caused by increased remote work and travel, excessive use of electricity, low awareness levels, etc.

1) Identify the potential impact of the issue in SOOP in relation to stakeholders
Results of the Financial Materiality Analysis

To assess the materiality of the issues, we analyzed the impact of non-financial capital such as natural, intellectual, human and social capitals on financial performance by period. In addition, we measured the period during which the risks/opportunities associated with each issue are reflected and lasted in SOOP’s financial performance. To assess the likelihood of occurrence of the issues, we also measured the frequency of occurrence of the impacting events. The prioritization of financial materiality was based on research by external experts and input from business unit/sector employees and management.

Results of the Financial Materiality Analysis
Issue Identified Impact1) Seriousness Likelihood of Occurrence
Talent Attraction and Development Risk

In a highly competitive and rapidly changing content industry, significant financial and non-financial losses may occur if employees leave for competitors.

Opportunity

Providing development opportunities to employees through competency development programs strengthens organizational culture and contributes to creative content planning and development.

Data Security and Privacy Risk

Possible property losses, litigation, and reputational risks due to leakage of streamers/users’ identities and privacy due to poor management.

Opportunity

Proactive measures on data security and privacy contribute to increasing the trust of stakeholders such as users/streamers/advertisers.

User Satisfaction Management Risk

Poor management of user satisfaction can lead to user churn to competing platforms.

Opportunity

Effective management of user satisfaction can reduce churn and help build long-term relationships.

Human Rights Impact Management Risk

Continued human rights violations in the content produced and distributed by the company or in the course of its business activities can be devastating to its credibility and brand image as an advertising channel and may lead to poor advertising performance.

Opportunity

Proactive responses to human rights issues can create new business opportunities. Advertising campaigns/content that respect and support human rights contribute to enhancing the credibility of the company with value-conscious consumers/stakeholders.

Enhance Global Competitiveness Risk

There are users with diverse cultures and values in the global market, and a lack of understanding of culture, language, laws and regulations of each country may expose company to various risks such as noise and reputation loss.

Opportunity

Entering the global market provides an opportunity to acquire new users and contributes to the creation of new revenue streams.

Work-Life Balance Risk

Reduced productivity of employees due to workload, resulting in a decrease in the quality of products and services and an increase in the likelihood of brain drain, which directly or indirectly negatively affects sales.

Opportunity

An organizational culture that maintains a work-life balance contributes to greater creativity and innovation, which encourages creative content planning and teamwork within the organization.

Advancing R&D Capabilities Risk

Investments to enhance R&D capabilities may incur additional costs to the company, including employee training costs, and may result in inefficiencies in terms of manpower/costs.

Opportunity

Contribute to customer satisfaction by improving user experience through continuous R&D to improve the platform.

Energy Efficiency Risk

The company’s energy efficiency(technology development, energy source conversion) issues may cause fluctuations in costs due to the prospect of future electricity price increases.

Opportunity

Costs can be reduced by improving energy efficiency, and incentives such as subsidies and tax benefits can be received from the government through renewable energy conversion projects.

DEI(Diversity, Equity and Inclusion) Risk

Direct and indirect discrimination can occur in organizations that lack diversity/inclusion, which can negatively impact organizational culture and teamwork.

Opportunity

Inclusive platforms/content can attract diverse users/streamers and open up new markets, and a diverse organizational culture can foster creativity/ innovation within an organization.

User Protection Risk

Violent/sexualized content may negatively impact users with special needs, such as children and young people, resulting in policy and regulatory/ reputational risks.

Opportunity

Taking proactive action against harmful content to protect users contributes to a healthy community environment, which helps to enhance brand image and credibility with users, advertisers, investors, and other stakeholders.

Business Ethics Risk

Corruption, embezzlement, and false reporting by company executives and employees may cause social problems, resulting in delays in administrative processing and disruption of platform operations, which may reduce the trust of users/advertisers and other stakeholders.

Opportunity

Business ethics culture can be spread through anti-corruption programs, strengthening internal controls, etc. and stakeholders such as investors/ advertisers prefer companies without ethical risks.

Community Impact Risk

Reputational risks such as community criticism, boycotts, and negative public opinion in case of negative impacts on local communities.

Opportunity

Contribute to expanding the company’s social impact through company-wide community contribution activities and contents such as employees/streamers.

Fair Trade Risk

Possible compliance issues due to unfair trade practices under the Fair Trade Act, such as offering unfair terms when concluding transactions with advertisers.

Opportunity

Contributing to enhancing credibility as an advertising channel by providing users with transparent and honest advertising campaigns.

Climate Change Risk

Concerns about changes in the procurement of service resources, such as the working/broadcasting environment of employees/streamers and the service use environment of users, due to climate change.

Opportunity

Contribute to improving brand reputation through climate change-related content and eco-friendly production practices in line with value consumption trends.

Health and Safety Risk

Accidents due to non-compliance with health and safety regulations, and the spread of infectious diseases and illnesses due to inadequate health and hygiene measures, may reduce work productivity.

Opportunity

Work engagement and productivity can be enhanced by actively operating systems that support employees‘ health management, including mental health.

Waste Management Risk

The company’s waste issues(generation, disposal) can affect the company’s reputation, market preferences of users, and the possibility of facing criticism and lawsuits from local communities/ environmental organizations due to environmental pollution at media and advertising shoots.

Opportunity

Creating an organizational culture of resource conservation through efforts to practice proper waste management and recycling may result in long-term cost savings.

Environmentally Friendly Production Risk

Environmental considerations in the company’s content production process may affect advertisers’ choice of platforms, the company’s reputation, and users’ market preferences.

Opportunity

Environmentally friendly production can highlight the environmental responsibility of the company/advertiser/brand and improve the efficiency of resource utilization.

1) Identify the potential impact of the issue in SOOP in relation to stakeholders

Double Materiality Matrix

As a result of a comprehensive analysis of the evaluation results of financial materiality and impact materiality for each issue, 14 reporting issues were finally decided and 3 potential issues were identified. Of the 14 reporting issues, 6 issues with both high financial materiality and impact materiality were designated as ‘strategic management areas’ in consideration of their priority, and reported in the Special Report section of this report to disclose and continuously monitor our performance.

Double Materiality Matrix
Priority Issues Category SDGs Reporting Page Related Issues Linkage/Combination
1 Talent Attraction and Development Strategic Management Area 4, 8 50~55p -
2 Data Security and Privacy 9 41~45p -
3 User Satisfaction Management 34~38p -
4 Human Rights Impact Management* 8, 16 65~66p
5 Work-Life Balance* 4 56~59p -
6 User Protection* 16 46~49p -
7 Enhance Global Competitiveness* Reporting Issue 8 19p -
8 Business Ethics 16 79~80p -
9 Advancing R&D Capabilities* 8,9 17p -
10 DEI(Diversity, Equity and Inclusion)* 4, 5, 10 60~61p -
11 Fair Trade* 16 79p Linked to ‘Business Ethics’ issue
12 Energy Efficiency* 7 63~64p Combined with ‘Climate Change’ and ‘Waste Management’ issues, and reported under ‘Environmental Impact Management’ topic
13 Health and Safety* 3 67~68p -
14 Community Impact 8, 10, 11 69~73p -
15 Waste Management* Potential Issue 12 64, 91p -
16 Climate Change* 13 63~64, 91p -
17 Environmentally Friendly Production* 64p -
(*)Issues are new issues compared to the previous year’s material issues.

Assessment Methodology Key Point

Enhancing Issue Pool
  • Utilize the sub-topics of the EU Sustainability Reporting Standard(ESRS)
  • Analyze material issues of five companies in the same industry, important regulatory environment and policy trends, and controversial issues for the last three years
  • Define an issue pool optimized for SOOP’s business environment through three rounds of inclusion and exclusion of issues
Identifying Impacts, Risks, and Opportunities
by Stakeholder Group
  • Analyze stakeholders based on revenue structure, considering the characteristics of SOOP as the platform company
  • Identify key stakeholders as streamers, advertisers/ advertising agencies, users, etc., and identify sustainability impacts, risks and opportunities related to each stakeholder
  • Define the period of the previously identified impacts, risks and opportunities(short-term: within 1 year, medium-term: 1-5 years, long-term: more than 5 years)
Expanding Participation of Internal and External Stakeholders
  • Conduct surveys among SOOP’s internal and external stakeholders, including users, streamers, employees, etc.
  • Involve employees from relevant departments in the process of identifying financial impacts and reporting to management
  • Deliberate on materiality assessment results through the ESG Committee in Q1 2024
List

Content List

  • Our Approach

    ESG Management Strategy

    #ESG Keywords #ESG Activities #ESG Organization Structure
    more
  • Our Approach

    Stakeholder Communication

    #Communication with Stakeholders #Distribution of Economic Values
    more
  • Our Approach

    Double Materiality Assessment

    #Double Materiality Assessment
    more
Top